Compliance

Zenjin Compliance

Technical findings become audit packets.

Zenjin Compliance maps technical findings from Data Security Posture Management, agentic red teaming, and AI evaluation to the frameworks you run, including EU AI Act, ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, GDPR, HIPAA, SOC 2, and more, and keeps audit evidence current as systems change.

At a glance

  • EU AI Act

    In the catalog

  • ISO 42001

    Mapped to findings

  • NIST AI RMF

    Same packet

  • SOC 2

    Fed by live product

Findings become the packet

Data Security Posture Management, red teaming, and evals write into controls. Observability and identity can attach runtime and approval evidence. The packet stays current because it is the same system.

Compliance workspace

Live posture instead of a quarterly PowerPoint.

Frameworks and controls

Regulations management and a controls library you can extend.

Mapping

Control mapping and regulation-to-application relationships.

Evidence and attestation

Packets that stay current because the products producing findings are the same system.

Sealed dark stone tablet hanging in black space like finished evidence

Today vs Zenjin

Same data. A completely different outcome.

Today

Fragmented and unknown.

Evidence is screenshots in tickets. Mapping a finding to EU AI Act or ISO 42001 takes a week and is stale the next day.

  • Siloed
  • Incomplete
  • Hard to trace
  • Manual
Disconnected shards labeled data, models, agents, applications, spreadsheets, and findings

With Zenjin

Unified and governed.

Workspace, controls library, regulation mapping, attestation, and packets fed by live product findings.

  • Connected
  • Complete
  • Real-time
  • Audit-ready
Glass panes for inventory, security, compliance, and evidence joined by a violet beam

Map, attest, export

From discovery to a defensible record.

  1. 01

    Choose frameworks

    AI and data regulations you actually operate, including custom internal ones.

    Glass cards for SOC 2, NIST, ISO 27001, and EU AI Act
  2. 02

    Map controls

    Findings from Data Security Posture Management, agentic red teaming, and evals attach to controls, not a sidebar spreadsheet.

    Findings on the left mapping across to frameworks on the right
  3. 03

    Attest and export

    Workspace posture, attestation, and an audit-ready packet.

    An audit-ready evidence packet stacked over mapped frameworks

Who it is for

  • GRC
  • Legal
  • CISO
  • Audit

FAQ

  • AI and model: EU AI Act, ISO/IEC 42001, NIST AI RMF, SR 11-7, DORA, and others in the catalog. Data and security: GDPR, HIPAA, SOC 2, PCI DSS, CCPA/CPRA, ISO 27001, NIST CSF. Custom internal frameworks are supported. We confirm the live catalog per tenant.

  • No. Policy-only GRC writes documents. Zenjin Compliance is the evidence plane for technical findings from the rest of the platform.

  • Data Security Posture Management, agentic red teaming, and AI evaluation write into controls. Observability and identity can attach runtime and approval evidence to the same packet.

  • Yes. Custom internal frameworks sit next to the catalog ones, with the same mapping and attestation path.

  • It stays current because the products producing findings are the same system. You are not pasting screenshots into a ticket a week later.

  • Yes. Workspace posture, control mapping, and attestation export as an audit-ready packet.